In a recent New York Times article about stretching, Gretchen Reynolds reported on the largest study ever conducted on the effectiveness of stretching. The results showed that…
stretching makes no difference one way or the other as far as injury prevention is concerned.
The percentage of those runners assigned to do 20 second static stretches before every run, was identical to the group assigned to the “no stretching” regimen. The study was conducted over the course of three months.
Dr. Ross Tucker, a physiologist in South Africa and co-author of the Web site The Science of Sport said, “There is a very important neurological effect of stretching. There is a reflex that prevents the muscle from being stretched too much.” This is exactly what Hanna Somatic Educators have taught their clients for years: the reflex Dr. Tucker refers to is called the “stretch reflex.” It is invoked by static stretching, and induces the muscle to contract back against the stretch, in effect making it tighter than it was before. This is a reflex that protects the muscle.
Reynolds goes on to write, that “Dynamic stretching, or exercises that increase your joints’ range of motion via constant movement, does not seem to invoke the inhibitory reflex of static stretching, Dr. Tucker said. When “you stretch through movement, you involve the brain much more, teaching proprioception and control, as well as improving flexibility.”
So let’s all do what the animals do: PANDICULATION.
Because that, dear readers, is what we call Hanna Somatic Educators have been teaching students for decades not to stretch to change muscle length, but to pandiculate muscle groups in order to re-set muscle length and regain brain level control of muscles and movement. This can prevent knee, hip, and back injuries when running while honing balance, proprioception and control.
Phil Wharton, well known author of the Wharton Stretch Book, now agrees that contracting a muscle first, then moving it through its range of motion is much more effective than simple, static stretching. Dynamic stretching, however similar to pandiculation, isn’t as effective if you don’t incorporate muscles in the center of the body, from which all movement originates. Think of an animal, first contracting its back muscles, then slowly and deliberately lengthening them only as far as is comfortable for them to go – then doing the exact same thing with the muscles of the front of the body.
Think about your typical athletic stretches and see if you can find a way to pandiculate them - meaning tighten the muscles FIRST, then slowly lengthen them to a comfortable length, then completely relax them. This can be done with hamstrings, quadriceps, waist muscles, triceps, biceps, you name it!
Here’s a short video that shows a couple of nice, easy pandiculations you can do prior to your run. Try them out and see what you think!
Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again – taking you feeds also, Thanks.
Hello. Great job. I did not expect this on a Wednesday. This is a great story. Thanks!
[...] active participation and the technique of pandiculation, muscles can change their contracted state in minutes! Through daily practice your muscles can stay [...]
Any chance this video will be restored? : )
Thanks for pointing this out. Honestly, I don’t recall which video this was and I don’t understand how it became disabled!! I’ll look into it and see what happened. So sorry! Seeing the difference between stretching and a movement that is a slow pandiculation that re-sets muscle length and tonus is helpful.
Best to you,
Martha
I just restored it! Thanks for pointing that out.
Best to you,
Martha
Thanks for the site. Just to be accurate and despite the headlines, the study did NOT show that “stretching makes no difference one way or the other as far as injury prevention is concerned”… it showed that getting runners to do 20-second static stretches before every run makes no difference,
There are other ways of sretching – and different timings – that do make a difference, but “they” will never be able to prove it to their satisfaction.
Hi,
Thanks for the clarification. I recently read a study that pointed to the use of stretch bands as “added resistance” (which makes me think of a practitioner’s hands as resistance) that showed the best results as far as a “stretching” method was concerned.
When you say “they,” do you mean the practitioner/runner who’s doing the stretching method that seems to work for them? I find that proving the efficacy of one’s method is both laborious and, for those of us in the Somatic Education field, only possible if we get grant money to run a study.
The best “proof” of the efficacy of Somatic Education thus far comes out of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, whose studies were done on the Feldenkrais Method (from which Hanna Somatics stems).
Thanks for your comment!
Martha